How Schediq compares
Feature-level comparison across Schediq, Calendly, and Acuity.
| Feature | Schediq | Calendly | Acuity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public booking page | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Round-robin / weighted routing | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Resource scheduling (rooms, equipment)Acuity supports rooms; Calendly doesn't. | ✓ | ✗ | — |
| Deterministic decision engine | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Versioned algorithms (v1 + v2 coexist) | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Replay any past decision under original code | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cryptographic execution-binding fingerprint | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Per-decision audit trailCompetitors offer activity logs, not decision-level audits. | ✓ | — | — |
| Tenant isolation enforced via Postgres RLS | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Outbound webhooks (signed, retryable, replayable) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google + Outlook calendar sync | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stripe billing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Detailed comparisons
Schediq vs. Calendly
Calendly is great for solo meetings. Schediq is built for service businesses — multi-staff rosters, AI insights, and mobile-first by default.
See comparisonSchediq vs. Acuity
Acuity is powerful but dense. Schediq is the modern alternative — same depth, cleaner UX, AI on top.
See comparisonSchediq vs. HubSpot Scheduler
HubSpot's scheduler is bolted onto a CRM. Schediq is a deterministic booking kernel — every routing decision is replayable, auditable, and provably fair.
See comparisonNo credit card required